| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 92 of 95 | 48% | 31 | criticized challenger |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 91 of 96 | 46% | 13 | criticized challenger |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 114 of 114 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19% |
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 0% | 30 of 72 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33% |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 60 of 68 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Consistently named a Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrants for both Financial Planning and Financial Close & Consolidation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle EPM Cloud or OneStream if you need the broadest enterprise finance suite” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle EPM if you want the most comprehensive finance/EPM suite.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle or SAP if you are a large multinational already using their ERPs and need deep, compliant financial consolidation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid enterprise-grade corporate performance management (CPM) suites (like OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM, or CCH Tagetik)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Oracle EPM or Workiva are overkill for most mid-market (too heavy/costly).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · hard negative
“| Oracle EPM Cloud | $150–$500+/user/month | Enterprise-grade with high implementation costs” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“If you're not already deep in Oracle's stack, avoid it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 140 of the 170 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM and are not a share of its labels.
417 of the 453 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.