Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM · September 2026 Edition
Oracle Fusion · 5 categories · Ranked

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

170Judge labels
13First choices
65Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
5Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Corporate performance ma for enterprise buyers
Rank 92 of 95 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 48% of its 31 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis0%92 of 9548%31criticized challenger
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%91 of 9646%13criticized challenger
Financial modeling and scenario planningPlanning and analysis0%114 of 114100%4under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%
Account reconciliationAccounting and close0%30 of 720%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%60 of 68100%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini13026
Gemini 3.5 Flash020911
Perplexity Sonar11114
Grok 4.1 Fast01236
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash11035
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K200246
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.502013

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct33 labels2
Paraphrase17 labels1
Comparative42 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained34 labels9
Scale-constrained16 labels1
Negative28 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative170 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consistently named a Leader in Gartner's Magic Quadrants for both Financial Planning and Financial Close & Consolidation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle EPM Cloud or OneStream if you need the broadest enterprise finance suite” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle EPM if you want the most comprehensive finance/EPM suite.” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Oracle or SAP if you are a large multinational already using their ERPs and need deep, compliant financial consolidation.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid enterprise-grade corporate performance management (CPM) suites (like OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM, or CCH Tagetik)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise tools like Oracle EPM or Workiva are overkill for most mid-market (too heavy/costly).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · hard negative
“| Oracle EPM Cloud | $150–$500+/user/month | Enterprise-grade with high implementation costs” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“If you're not already deep in Oracle's stack, avoid it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, over the 170 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OneStream131 of 17041Not in the top three
Anaplan108 of 17013Not in the top three
Workday Adaptive Planning93 of 17010Not in the top three
Vena70 of 1709Not in the top three
Planful69 of 1704Not in the top three
CCH Tagetik47 of 1701Not in the top three
Pigment45 of 1703Not in the top three
SAP Analytics Cloud38 of 1701Not in the top three
Prophix36 of 1704Not in the top three
Datarails32 of 1704Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 140 of the 170 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai70
cfoshortlist.com62
onestream.com50
gartner.com46
worldmetrics.org44
golimelight.com42
oracle.comYour site36
prophix.com35
gbhackers.com34
softwareconnect.com34

417 of the 453 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Cloud EPM 23Oracle EPM 14Oracle EPM Cloud 2Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS) 1Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation & Close) 1Oracle Cloud EPM (Hyperion) 1Oracle Cloud EPM / NetSuite 1Oracle EPM (Hyperion) 1Oracle EPM Enterprise 1Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM / NetSuite 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack