Every category where a model named IBM Planning Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	19 of 52	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	93 of 95	60%	5	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	96 of 114	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM Planning Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM Planning Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative18 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A long-standing titan in the market known for its powerful calculation engine (TM1)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Examples: IBM Cognos TM1 ... The Trap: Avoid these if you want your finance team to actually use the tool.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

“Legacy On-Premise EPMs (Avoid Entirely)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative

“Older technology; requires significant expertise; Excel-dependent workflows can be limiting” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · soft negative

“Anaplan, Workday, IBM Planning Analytics, SAP. Powerful but heavier to staff” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial modeling · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM Planning Analytics, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM Planning Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan63 of 6417Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning56 of 643Not in the top three

OneStream43 of 645Not in the top three

Vena37 of 641Not in the top three

Pigment33 of 647Not in the top three

SAP Analytics Cloud29 of 640Not in the top three

Planful28 of 640Not in the top three

Board24 of 641Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM23 of 644Not in the top three

Datarails21 of 642Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM Planning Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 64 answers that named IBM Planning Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai32

cfoshortlist.com31

board.com21

worldmetrics.org19

getaleph.com18

learn.g2.com18

gartner.com17

g2.com16

anaplan.com15

golimelight.com15

202 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming IBM Planning Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises17

getaleph.com/answers/top-fpa-software-202616

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software15

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software14

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-fpa-software-202614

learn.g2.com/best-fpa-software14

financecopilothq.com/best-fpa-software12

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-planning-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM Planning Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM Planning Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Planning Analytics (TM1) 3IBM Cognos TM1 1IBM Planning Analytics (formerly TM1) & Cognos 1IBM TM1 (On-Premise) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Planning Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Planning Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.