Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › apexanalytix · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

apexanalytix

4Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. apexanalytix was named 1 time in Supplier management, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business94 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market69 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise10 of 87

under the label threshold

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named apexanalytix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	69 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for apexanalytix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated apexanalytix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as apexanalytix, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and apexanalytix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa4 of 40Not in the top three

Jaggaer3 of 40Not in the top three

SAP Ariba3 of 40Not in the top three

Avetta2 of 40Not in the top three

GEP SMART2 of 40Not in the top three

Ivalua2 of 40Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement2 of 40Not in the top three

Achilles1 of 40Not in the top three

ComplianceQuest1 of 40Not in the top three

Gatekeeper1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named apexanalytix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 4 answers that named apexanalytix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com2

learn.g2.com2

blog.softexpert.com1

compliancequest.com1

g2.com1

gitnux.org1

highradius.com1

infraspeak.com1

kodiakhub.com1

mindsprint.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming apexanalytix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/supplier-relationship-management-software2

learn.g2.com/best-supplier-relationship-management-software2

blog.softexpert.com/en/supplier-management-software1

compliancequest.com/supplier-relationship-management-software1

g2.com/categories/supplier-relationship-management-srm1

g2.com/categories/vendor-management/small-business1

g2.com/products/coupa-software-coupa/reviews1

g2.com/products/jaggaer/reviews1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when apexanalytix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as apexanalytix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at apexanalytix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.