Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Avetta · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Avetta

11Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Avetta was named 6 times in Supplier management, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business95 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise62 of 87

under the label threshold

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Avetta for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	25 of 80	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Avetta yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Avetta across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Avetta is a good fit for mid-market programs focused on structured compliance evidence capture” Llama 4 Maverick · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Specializes in risk and compliance, rather than full procurement suites.” Mistral Small · Supplier management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High costs cited by reviewers; Poor customer support quality” MiniMax M2.5 · Supplier management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Avetta, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avetta was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa11 of 111Not in the top three

Jaggaer11 of 110Not in the top three

SAP Ariba10 of 112Not in the top three

GEP SMART9 of 111Not in the top three

Ivalua8 of 110Not in the top three

Kodiak Hub3 of 110Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement3 of 110Not in the top three

Zycus3 of 110Not in the top three

Achilles2 of 110Not in the top three

EcoVadis2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avetta. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Avetta and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com7

mindsprint.com7

gartner.com5

g2.com4

guideflow.com4

us.caddi.com4

wifitalents.com4

worldmetrics.org4

gitnux.org3

kodiakhub.com3

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Avetta came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-supplier-relationship-management-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/supplier-onboarding-software4

guideflow.com/blog/supplier-relationship-management-software4

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/vendor-management-software4

us.caddi.com/resources/insights/supplier-management-software4

kodiakhub.com/blog/8-best-srm-systems-20263

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/supplier-relationship-management-software3

procurekey.com/best-supplier-management-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avetta's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avetta, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at avetta.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.