GEP · 3 categories · RankedGEP SMART
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 9% | 4 of 127 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 14 of 85 | 8% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 21 of 80 | 23% | 13 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“GEP SMART (Best Overall Mid-Market All-in-One) ... frequently cited as the strongest fit specifically for mid-market organizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“The best strategic sourcing software for a mid-market B2B company is GEP SMART” Llama 4 Maverick · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“Ivalua and GEP SMART are the top strategic sourcing software choices” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“GEP SMART is considered the strongest choice for global procurement teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Supplier management · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“capable but can be a mismatch if you only need a focused supplier-management workflow rather than a broader procurement suite” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Often dinged for "enterprise-scale complexity," deteriorating supplier onboarding, UX friction, and long implementation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically out of reach due to high licensing fees, lengthy implementation times, and complex setups” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · soft negative
“rather than heavy-duty enterprise suites (like *SAP Ariba* or *GEP*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 126 of the 139 answers that named GEP SMART and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
392 of the 392 domain citations in answers naming GEP SMART came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as GEP SMART
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GEP SMART's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GEP SMART, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gep.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.