Every category where a model named AppDeck Board Portal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	21 of 97	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AppDeck Board Portal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AppDeck Board Portal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose AppDeck, BoardPro, or Boardable if you want to modernize your operations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best value for private companies with modern UX: AppDeck (flat subscription, real-time dashboards) is a strong alternative” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Real-Time CFO Reporting: AppDeck ... Great value if you're tired of static PDF board packs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“AppDeck is another solid option if you want modern reporting and can afford a higher entry point” Perplexity Sonar · Board · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AppDeck Board Portal, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppDeck Board Portal was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Boardable30 of 419Not in the top three

OnBoard30 of 415Not in the top three

BoardPro29 of 4111Not in the top three

Nasdaq Boardvantage21 of 411Not in the top three

Diligent Boards18 of 413Not in the top three

Diligent14 of 411Not in the top three

BoardEffect13 of 410Not in the top three

Azeus Convene9 of 410Not in the top three

Planful9 of 410Not in the top three

Aleph8 of 411Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppDeck Board Portal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 41 answers that named AppDeck Board Portal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdeck.comYour site41

board-room.org27

clearpointstrategy.com25

worldmetrics.org21

guideflow.com20

fast.io18

g2.com18

getaleph.com17

capterra.com14

imboard.ai14

174 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming AppDeck Board Portal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison36

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202632

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software25

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software20

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software20

getaleph.com/answers/board-investor-reporting-software17

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202515

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as AppDeck Board Portal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AppDeck Board Portal; a claim can dispute any of them.

AppDeck 16

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppDeck Board Portal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppDeck Board Portal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appdeck.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.