Every category where a model named Azeus Convene for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	28 of 97	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Azeus Convene yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Azeus Convene across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if you want simple usability at a low annual cost: Convene — starts at $400/year” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · budget prompt · alternative

“Azeus Convene (praised for ease of use), which generally receive fewer complaints” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Board · negative prompt · alternative

“Full governance platform with board packs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some users report login issues, syncing problems” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Azeus Convene, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azeus Convene was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Nasdaq Boardvantage27 of 319Not in the top three

OnBoard27 of 312Not in the top three

Diligent Boards25 of 318Not in the top three

Boardable15 of 311Not in the top three

Board Intelligence12 of 310Not in the top three

BoardEffect12 of 310Not in the top three

Planful12 of 310Not in the top three

BoardPro11 of 313Not in the top three

Govenda10 of 311Not in the top three

AppDeck Board Portal9 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azeus Convene. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Azeus Convene and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org24

appdeck.com21

clearpointstrategy.com19

board-room.org15

boardintelligence.com14

fast.io13

gitnux.org13

g2.com11

learn.g2.com11

zipdo.co10

151 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming Azeus Convene came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software22

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software19

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison16

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software13

learn.g2.com/best-board-management-software11

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202610

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software10

zipdo.co/best/board-reporting-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Azeus Convene

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azeus Convene; a claim can dispute any of them.

Convene 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azeus Convene's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azeus Convene, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at azeusconvene.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.