Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Capboard · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Capboard

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Capboard was named 5 times in Cap table management, where Carta led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business13 of 33

under the label threshold

Mid-market13 of 41

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cap table management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Capboard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cap table management	Equity and corporate	0%	13 of 41	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Carta at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Capboard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Capboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best low-cost option: Capboard (~$30/month) for a simple, scalable setup.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cap table management · budget prompt · alternative

“Go with Eqvista or Capboard until you raise significant funding.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cap table management · comparative prompt · alternative

“Capboard (~$30/mo)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cap table management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Capboard, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Capboard was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Carta10 of 105Not in the top three

Eqvista9 of 104Not in the top three

Pulley9 of 103Not in the top three

Cake Equity9 of 101Not in the top three

Fidelity Private Shares6 of 101Not in the top three

Ledgy6 of 100Not in the top three

AngelList Stack3 of 100Not in the top three

Shareworks3 of 100Not in the top three

Mantle2 of 101Not in the top three

Qapita2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Capboard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Capboard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cakeequity.com10

waveup.com10

aifundingtracker.com7

guideflow.com7

cheqly.com6

ctacquisitions.com4

eqvista.com4

qapita.com4

valueaddvc.com4

vcbeast.com4

Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Capboard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cakeequity.com/guides/best-cap-table-software10

waveup.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software10

aifundingtracker.com/best-cap-table-management-software7

guideflow.com/blog/cap-table-management-software7

cheqly.com/best-cap-table-software-startups6

ctacquisitions.com/best-cap-table-software-20264

eqvista.com/cap-table-management-software-startups4

qapita.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Capboard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Capboard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at capboard.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.