Every category where a model named Eqvista for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cap table management	Equity and corporate	12%	3 of 41	0%	35	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eqvista yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eqvista across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	3	0	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	2	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase12 labels2

Comparative26 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels12

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Eqvista - G2’s #1 Equity Management Platform, provides comprehensive equity management with expert 409A valuations” Llama 4 Maverick · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Eqvista is typically the strongest budget pick because it's inexpensive and bundles 409A valuations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cap table management · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Carta Launch (free) or Eqvista (free up to 20)” Kimi K2 · Cap table management · budget prompt · first choice

“starting with Carta Launch, Pulley, or Eqvista’s free tier is highly recommended” Mistral Small · Cap table management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eqvista, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eqvista was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Carta91 of 9430Compare →

Pulley81 of 9420Not in the top three

Cake Equity63 of 9410Not in the top three

Ledgy56 of 940Not in the top three

Shareworks38 of 945Not in the top three

Qapita24 of 943Compare →

Fidelity Private Shares19 of 940Not in the top three

Mantle14 of 945Not in the top three

AngelList Stack12 of 940Not in the top three

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions9 of 942Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eqvista. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 82 of the 94 answers that named Eqvista and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cakeequity.com68

eqvista.comYour site54

waveup.com48

guideflow.com47

qapita.com40

valueaddvc.com37

aifundingtracker.com32

carta.com29

cheqly.com27

pulley.com26

354 of the 408 domain citations in answers naming Eqvista came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cakeequity.com/guides/best-cap-table-software56

waveup.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software48

guideflow.com/blog/cap-table-management-software42

eqvista.com/cap-table-management-software-startups34

valueaddvc.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-tools-in-2026-carta-pulley-angellist-capdesk34

aifundingtracker.com/best-cap-table-management-software32

cheqly.com/best-cap-table-software-startups27

qapita.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eqvista's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eqvista, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eqvista.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.