Every category where a model named Caribou for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	4%	7 of 101	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Caribou yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Caribou across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels3

Paraphrase2 labels2

Comparative16 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend requesting demos from Caribou and Exactera first, as both are specifically designed with mid-market needs and budgets in mind.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · first choice

“If you want minimal internal hassle and fast setup, and your company has 2-10 entities: Caribou is the clear winner.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · first choice

“an innovative solution for multi-entity organizations to efficiently seek intragroup agreements” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cloud-based, user-friendly for fast-growing companies; agile workflows, compliance emphasis.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Caribou, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Caribou was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TPGenie20 of 323Not among the top eight

Exactera Transfer Pricing16 of 322Not among the top eight

Aibidia14 of 322Not among the top eight

Commenda14 of 320Not among the top eight

PlaidCloud Operational Transfer Pricing12 of 323Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE8 of 323Not among the top eight

Bloomberg Tax Transfer Pricing8 of 320Not among the top eight

ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing6 of 323Not among the top eight

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing6 of 323Not among the top eight

Sovos Transfer Pricing6 of 321Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Caribou. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Caribou and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getsphere.com27

gitnux.org22

sourceforge.net22

zipdo.co17

commenda.io16

g2.com16

intrapricing.com15

itechguides.com15

worldmetrics.org14

usecaribou.comYour site13

164 of the 177 domain citations in answers naming Caribou came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance27

gitnux.org/best/transfer-pricing-software22

zipdo.co/best/transfer-pricing-software15

g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing13

intrapricing.com/blog/top-10-transfer-pricing-documentation-software-tools-in-202613

commenda.io/transfer-pricing/commenda-vs-caribou11

itechguides.com/best/transfer-pricing-software11

sourceforge.net/software/transfer-pricing/usa11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

usecaribou.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Caribou takes 4% of first choices and TPGenie takes 30%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “transfer pricing platform”

Position for “transfer pricing platforms”

Searches for its name, Google: 201,000 a month (“caribou”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 30,293 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 271 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 158 · 3 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 660
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 101 in transfer pricing

Segment leader

30%

TPGenie

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on usecaribou.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	23	5		2026-10-01	Transfer pricing, Entity management
Glossary or explainer	1	0		2025-07-08	Transfer pricing

Most recent

2026-10-01Transfer pricing audit blog
2026-09-22Form 5472 the filing your delaware c corp may owe the irs blog
2026-09-17Best transfer pricing software blog
2026-09-01Transfer pricing documentation blog
2026-08-19Entity management blog
2025-12-19Announcing our 2 8m seed round blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page usecaribou.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Caribou

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Caribou is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Transfer pricing software with the experts built in.
usecaribou.com
For: Built for multi-entity companies, at every stage
usecaribou.com
Price stated: One price usecaribou.com
Free plan or trial: Get your free assessment usecaribou.com
Customers named: EncordAcme GroupAcme Corp
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Caribou's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: usecaribou.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Caribou's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Caribou, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Caribou by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Caribou is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Caribou, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.