| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer pricing | Tax and compliance | 0% | 22 of 101 | 27% | 11 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best-in-class comparables database, deep integration with tax research content, and a modular design that scales from documentation to operational TP management.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
“It's consistently ranked as the best overall solution.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
“stick to off-the-shelf like Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE or Exactera for compliant docs at lower cost” Grok 4.1 Fast · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · alternative
“If you're already in Thomson Reuters ecosystem: ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing” Kimi K2 · Transfer pricing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Products such as ONESOURCE and Orbitax cover broader tax workflows. That may be useful, but confirm precisely which transfer-pricing functions are included” GPT-6 Luna · Transfer pricing · negative prompt · soft negative
“While enterprise giants like ONESOURCE (Thomson Reuters) exist, they are often too costly and resource-heavy for mid-market teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · soft negative
“notoriously complex, with longer implementation times and higher licensing costs. Overkill for most mid-market firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing and are not a share of its labels.
114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ONESOURCE Transfer Pricing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: