Every category where a model named Cash App for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	81 of 83	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	83 of 83	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	65 of 69	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	70 of 83	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cash App yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cash App across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative26 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be cautious with consumer-facing cash apps like Cash App (by Block, Inc.), especially for P2P transfers or holding significant balances, due to high fraud risks and poor support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash application · negative prompt · hard negative

“Apps like Zelle, Venmo, and Cash App are designed strictly for domestic peer-to-peer transfers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“Zelle/Venmo/Cash App | Very High | No buyer/seller protection, irreversible” Kimi K2 · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Apps (Zelle, Venmo, Cash App): Why avoid:” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cash App, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cash App was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Venmo17 of 250Not in the top three

Zelle14 of 250Not in the top three

PayPal12 of 250Not in the top three

HighRadius7 of 252Not in the top three

Stripe7 of 250Not in the top three

BILL6 of 251Not in the top three

Billtrust5 of 250Not in the top three

BlackLine Cash Application5 of 250Not in the top three

Melio5 of 250Not in the top three

Payoneer5 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cash App. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Cash App and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com11

g2.com9

highradius.com8

capterra.com7

nerdwallet.com7

bbb.org6

cashbook.com6

contractor-of-record.com6

ledge.co6

remote.com6

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Cash App came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools8

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide6

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts6

ledge.co/content/cash-application-software6

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools6

lunos.ai/blog/best-cash-application-software5

cashflowpick.com/cash-application-software4

corcentric.com/cash-application-risk-considerations-when-choosing-order-to-cash-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cash App

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cash App; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cash App (by Block, Inc.) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cash App's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cash App, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cashapp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.