Every category where a model named Venmo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	83 of 83	100%	7	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	0%	66 of 69	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	80 of 83	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	79 of 83	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Venmo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Venmo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative24 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“recommended to avoid using consumer payment apps like Venmo for contractor payments due to compliance risks and high fees” Llama 4 Maverick · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“Once money leaves your account via Zelle or Venmo, it is often considered a final, irreversible transfer.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

“generic payment apps (like PayPal or Venmo)... are major operational bottlenecks and compliance risks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contractor payments · scale prompt · hard negative

“Apps like Zelle, Venmo, and Cash App are designed strictly for domestic peer-to-peer transfers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Venmo, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Venmo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cash App17 of 250Not in the top three

Zelle15 of 250Not in the top three

PayPal12 of 250Not in the top three

Deel9 of 254Not in the top three

Wise Business7 of 254Not in the top three

BILL6 of 250Not in the top three

Stripe6 of 250Not in the top three

Remote5 of 251Not in the top three

Payoneer5 of 250Not in the top three

Rippling5 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Venmo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 25 answers that named Venmo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com10

contractor-of-record.com8

remote.com7

toku.com7

g2.com6

worksuite.com6

bbb.org5

linkedin.com5

mellow.io5

analyticsinsight.net4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Venmo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts8

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools7

toku.com/resources/best-payment-methods-for-international-contractors7

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software6

mellow.io/news-and-articles/paying-international-contractors-securely-2026-best-platforms-5

analyticsinsight.net/business/best-contractor-payment-service-providers-in-20264

guideflow.com/blog/contractor-payment-software4

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Venmo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Venmo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at venmo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.