Every category where a model named Chargebee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	27 of 77	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	22 of 86	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chargebee yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chargebee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	0	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels3

Paraphrase10 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if your company runs primarily on subscription/recurring billing, Chargebee is the safest and most complete bet” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · direct prompt · alternative

“like complex usage‑based billing or strict e‑invoicing compliance—consider Chargebee or Invoiced” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Invoicing software · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Subscription & Contract-Based B2B (SaaS): Chargebee or Stripe Billing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Invoicing software · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“very fast to implement, has low overhead, and automates core performance obligations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Using a tool like Stripe or Chargebee primarily for billing... Why to avoid” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · hard negative

“no percentage-of-revenue overage fees (unlike competitors like Maxio or Chargebee)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chargebee, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chargebee was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Maxio21 of 631Not in the top three

Zuora20 of 632Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online17 of 636Not in the top three

QuickBooks16 of 633Not in the top three

Xero16 of 631Not in the top three

Stripe Billing14 of 630Not in the top three

NetSuite11 of 634Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite11 of 630Not in the top three

Sage Intacct11 of 630Not in the top three

Zuora Revenue10 of 633Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chargebee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 63 answers that named Chargebee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org23

wifitalents.com21

worldmetrics.org21

getapp.com20

chargebee.comYour site15

thecfoclub.com15

ledgerup.ai14

sparklayer.io13

pipedrive.com12

bill.com11

150 of the 165 domain citations in answers naming Chargebee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gitnux.org/best/b2b-invoicing-software19

wifitalents.com/best/b2b-invoicing-software14

sparklayer.io/blog/2025/04/28/b2b-invoicing-best-apps13

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-enterprise-invoicing-software13

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software12

bill.com/blog/best-invoice-automation-software11

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software11

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202611

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Chargebee

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chargebee; a claim can dispute any of them.

Chargebee (with RevRec module) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chargebee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chargebee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chargebee.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.