Every category where a model named Zuora for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	74 of 77	50%	8	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zuora yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zuora across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels4

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative10 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Have complex multi-element contracts | RightRev, Zuora” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · scale prompt · alternative

“include RightRev, Zuora (for enterprise)” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“steering clear of platforms known for rigidity, long implementations, and integration failures (Zuora/RevPro being the most documented of those)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid expensive enterprise solutions like NetSuite or Zuora” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · hard negative

“Dedicated rev-rec tools like Maxio or Zuora are typically too expensive ($599+/mo or custom).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · soft negative

“frequently recommended over legacy tools like Zuora for mid-sized firms” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zuora, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zuora was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Maxio23 of 503Not in the top three

Chargebee20 of 500Not in the top three

Sage Intacct14 of 501Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online12 of 503Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite11 of 500Not in the top three

HighRadius10 of 502Not in the top three

Stripe Revenue Recognition9 of 503Not in the top three

RightRev9 of 501Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management9 of 500Not in the top three

Stripe Billing9 of 500Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zuora. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 50 answers that named Zuora and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ledgerup.ai17

worldmetrics.org17

gitnux.org14

dualentry.com12

hubifi.com12

pipedrive.com12

getapp.com11

blog.alguna.com10

g2.com10

rightrev.com10

125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Zuora came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202613

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software12

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software12

wise.com/us/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software10

eleven.run/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software9

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software8

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-enterprise-invoicing-software8

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Zuora

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zuora; a claim can dispute any of them.

Zuora / Zuora RevPro 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zuora's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zuora, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zuora.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.