AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Citrix ShareFile · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Citrix ShareFile

5Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Citrix ShareFile was named 3 times in Virtual data rooms, where iDeals led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In virtual data rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Citrix ShareFile for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Virtual data roomsEquity and corporate0%38 of 4833%3under 10 labels · led by iDeals at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Citrix ShareFile yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Citrix ShareFile across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500202
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Multiple security incidents, including a major 2018-2019 breach where Iranian hackers stole 6-10TB of data” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Citrix ShareFile, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Citrix ShareFile was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Box4 of 50Not among the top eight
Datasite Diligence3 of 50Not among the top eight
iDeals3 of 50Not among the top eight
Firmex2 of 50Not among the top eight
Intralinks2 of 50Not among the top eight
SecureDocs1 of 51Not among the top eight
Ansarada1 of 50Not among the top eight
CapLinked1 of 50Not among the top eight
DocSend1 of 50Not among the top eight
Drooms1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Citrix ShareFile. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Citrix ShareFile and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

ellty.com3
data-rooms.org2
dataroom-providers.org2
datarooms.org2
dataroomsearch.blog2
fast.io2
financesonline.com2
firmroom.com2
peony.ink2
smartroom.com2

No domain is on file for Citrix ShareFile, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Citrix ShareFile

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Citrix ShareFile's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Citrix ShareFile, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Citrix ShareFile by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Citrix ShareFile is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Citrix ShareFile, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.