1 category · RankedDatasite Diligence
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual data rooms | Equity and corporate | 3% | 9 of 48 | 47% | 53 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Datasite Diligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Built around M&A workflows, with AI-assisted document search and review, redaction, Q&A, and deal tools. A strong candidate when handling a large room or many bidders.” GPT-6 Luna · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Intralinks/Datasite if: You're working on a large M&A deal where your counterparty (investment bank) mandates it” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for large enterprise M&A and complex, high-value transactions... considered the enterprise standard for M&A” Mistral Small · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice
“The go-to for complex, high-value, document-intensive transactions; handles cross-border deal complexity best” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Virtual data rooms · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid ... Enterprise providers like Datasite or Intralinks: $5,000–$50,000+ per deal” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid legacy per-page pricing (Intralinks, Datasite) unless doing large cross-border deals.” Kimi K2 · Virtual data rooms · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid legacy providers like Datasite and Intralinks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid legacy providers (e.g., Datasite, Intralinks)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Datasite Diligence, over the 156 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Datasite Diligence was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 149 of the 156 answers that named Datasite Diligence and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
607 of the 607 domain citations in answers naming Datasite Diligence came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
datasite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Datasite Diligence takes 3% of first choices and iDeals takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“datasite diligence”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,733 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,102 · 183 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,282
- Paid Google search
- 14 searches its ads show for, about 120 clicks and $10,771 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 28 across its categories
- Named in
- 156 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 149 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1,209 | undated | |||
| Blog | 287 | 26 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| News or press | 273 | 4 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 77 | 23 | 2026-11-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 11 | 0 | 2025-10-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2024-08-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-29 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-032026 florida acg capital connection conference or event
- 2026-10-29Datasite kart race santiago conference or event
- 2026-10-22Dallas dealmakers night 2026 x essential connections generalpage conference or event
- 2026-10-15Dealmakers gala stockholm 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-14New york private capital summit conference or event
- 2026-10-09Singapore grand prix dealmakers gala 2026 conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page datasite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Datasite Diligence
Follow Datasite Diligence
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Datasite Diligence is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- get to close with your Diligence data room
- For
- dealmakers
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free datasite.com
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 42001GDPRCPRAISO/IEC 27001270172701827701SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- Microsoft Azure
- Customers named
- Gilmour SpaceBT Group PLCDeutsche Bank
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations
What Datasite Diligence's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: datasite.com, datasite.com/en/resources/faqs/compliance, datasite.com/en/solutions/you, datasite.com/en/company/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datasite Diligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datasite Diligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Datasite Diligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Datasite Diligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Datasite Diligence, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.