Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › deFacto Global · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

deFacto Global

5Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. deFacto Global was named 5 times in Corporate performance ma, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market7 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named deFacto Global for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	5%	7 of 95	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for deFacto Global yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated deFacto Global across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“deFacto Global - a unified platform that offers FP&A, CapEx, HR, rolling forecasts, and driver-based modeling” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Top pick for mid‑size B2B: deFacto Global” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“deFacto Global is the better fit if you want a more integrated finance + operational planning platform” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“includes Planful, Prophix, Drivetrain, Workday Adaptive Planning, and deFacto Global” Llama 4 Maverick · Corporate performance ma · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as deFacto Global, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and deFacto Global was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Planful3 of 52Not in the top three

Prophix3 of 51Not in the top three

Lattice3 of 50Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning3 of 50Not in the top three

15Five2 of 50Not in the top three

Mosaic2 of 50Not in the top three

Vena2 of 50Not in the top three

Anaplan1 of 50Not in the top three

Betterworks1 of 50Not in the top three

Cube1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named deFacto Global. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named deFacto Global and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

defactoglobal.comYour site4

hrtechsaas.com4

learn.g2.com4

barc.com3

cfobound.com3

okrstool.com3

peoplegoal.com3

abacum.ai2

lupahire.com2

tech.co2

Twenty-six of the thirty domain citations in answers naming deFacto Global came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

defactoglobal.com/blog/best-corporate-performance-management-software4

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-performance-management-software-mid-market4

learn.g2.com/best-corporate-performance-management-software4

barc.com/reviews/corporate-performance-management-en3

cfobound.com/tools/corporate-performance-management3

okrstool.com/blog/performance-management-software3

peoplegoal.com/blog/corporate-performance-management-software3

abacum.ai/blog/best-cpm-corporate-performance-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when deFacto Global's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as deFacto Global, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at defactoglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.