Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Duco · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Duco

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Duco was named 2 times in Account reconciliation, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market28 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprise30 of 61

under the label threshold

In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Duco for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	28 of 72	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Duco yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Duco across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose a no-code ops tool if you reconcile lots of non-ERP data sources.” GPT-5.4 mini · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

“Known for cloud-native, no-code reconciliation and strong match rates.” Perplexity Sonar · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Duco, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Duco was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BlackLine3 of 33Not in the top three

Trintech2 of 31Not in the top three

FloQast2 of 30Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite2 of 30Not in the top three

ReconArt2 of 30Not in the top three

Trintech Cadency1 of 31Not in the top three

Hevo Data1 of 30Not in the top three

HighRadius1 of 30Not in the top three

Microsoft Excel1 of 30Not in the top three

Numeric1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Duco. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Duco and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com1

aurum.solutions1

blackline.com1

du.co1

erpresearch.com1

gartner.com1

gitnux.org1

guideflow.com1

hevodata.com1

highradius.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Duco came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/best-automated-reconciliation-software-solutions1

aurum.solutions/resources/the-top-10-reconciliation-software-essentials1

blackline.com/products/financial-close/transaction-matching1

du.co/product/reconciliation1

erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/reconciliation1

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-reconciliation-solutions1

gitnux.org/best/data-reconciliation-software1

gitnux.org/best/reconcilation-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Duco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Duco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at duco.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.