Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ebury · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ebury

10Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ebury was named 5 times in Cross-border payments, where Wise Business led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 75

under the label threshold

In cross-border payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ebury for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	4%	6 of 83	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ebury yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ebury across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“my default recommendation would be Ebury Hedge if you want hedging + international payments in one platform” Perplexity Sonar · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend iBanFirst or Ebury as top all-in-one platforms tailored to this space.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you're UK/EU-based and want hedging without complexity: → Ebury” Kimi K2 · Cross-border payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ebury, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ebury was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Corpay Cross-Border7 of 101Not in the top three

Wise Business5 of 101Not in the top three

Airwallex5 of 100Not in the top three

Kantox4 of 101Not in the top three

Thunes4 of 100Not in the top three

Banking Circle3 of 100Not in the top three

Checkout.com3 of 100Not in the top three

Currencycloud3 of 100Not in the top three

Payoneer3 of 100Not in the top three

Stripe3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ebury. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Ebury and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

f6s.com6

kantox.com5

dashdevs.com4

ebury.comYour site4

walletinvestor.com4

airwallex.com3

alltopbusiness.com3

concourse.ai3

connectpay.com3

highradius.com3

Thirty-four of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Ebury came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dashdevs.com/blog/top-cross-border-payments-companies4

f6s.com/software/category/currency-risk-management4

kantox.com/4

walletinvestor.com/news/economics-news/best-automated-fx-risk-management-and-hedging-infra4

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/cross-border-payment-services-solutions3

alltopbusiness.com/fx-risk-management-suppliers3

concourse.ai/insights/best-fx-risk-management-software3

connectpay.com/blog/cross-border-payments-companies3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Ebury

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ebury; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ebury Hedge 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ebury's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ebury, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ebury.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.