Every category where a model named Finlens for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	28 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Finlens yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Finlens across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels3

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained6 labels4

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Simple, zero-migration GAAP compliance... Best for: Seed-to-Series A SaaS startups on QuickBooks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative

“you must look for specialized add-ons (like Finlens) that integrate natively” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · alternative

“BillingPlatform, or Finlens for ASC 606 automation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Finlens, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Finlens was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Online10 of 240Not in the top three

Numeric9 of 245Not in the top three

FloQast9 of 240Not in the top three

Maxio9 of 240Not in the top three

Stripe Revenue Recognition7 of 242Not in the top three

BlackLine7 of 241Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management7 of 240Not in the top three

Xero7 of 240Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec6 of 240Not in the top three

PivotXL6 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Finlens. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 24 answers that named Finlens and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

finlens.appYour site19

getapp.com9

hubifi.com9

numeric.io9

dokka.com8

learn.g2.com8

worldmetrics.org8

capterra.com7

pivotxl.com7

erpresearch.com6

Seventy-one of the ninety domain citations in answers naming Finlens came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

finlens.app/blogs/month-end-close-tools9

numeric.io/blog/financial-close-software9

dokka.com/best-financial-close-software-for-small-businesses8

getapp.com/all-software/financial-close/org/small-business7

learn.g2.com/best-financial-close-software7

finlens.app/blogs/best-tools-for-saas-revenue-recognition6

gogravity.com/blog/revenue-recognition-mistakes6

pivotxl.com/top-financial-close-software-20256

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Finlens

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Finlens; a claim can dispute any of them.

Finlens (or Puzzle) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Finlens's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Finlens, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at finlens.app is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.