Every category where a model named FIS Quantum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	103 of 124	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FIS Quantum yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FIS Quantum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Generative AI queries, payment approval workflows, strong ERP integrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

“FIS Quantum offers faster deployment” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Older/Legacy Systems (e.g., some FIS Quantum or Oracle TMS modules): Frequently criticized for clunky interfaces, poor scalability... Avoid if you need cloud-native” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · hard negative

“Traditional enterprise systems (like SAP Treasury or FIS Quantum) can take 6 to 18 months.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · scale prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FIS Quantum, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Quantum was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba19 of 1913Not in the top three

GTreasury16 of 195Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management14 of 190Not in the top three

Trovata9 of 192Not in the top three

ION Treasury8 of 191Not in the top three

HighRadius6 of 191Not in the top three

Oracle Treasury5 of 190Not in the top three

Ripple Treasury4 of 190Not in the top three

Agicap3 of 190Not in the top three

Coupa Treasury3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS Quantum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 19 answers that named FIS Quantum and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com15

treasury.ripple.com12

eco.com11

checkthat.ai9

erpresearch.com6

finantrix.com6

g2.com6

bestfinancesites.com5

debtbook.com5

euromoney.com5

Eighty of the eighty domain citations in answers naming FIS Quantum came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems14

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-202611

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems11

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools9

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/treasury-liquidity-management-solutions6

bestfinancesites.com/treasury-management-systems5

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems5

euromoney.com/corporate-banking/competitive-intelligence/top-ranked-tms-providers5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FIS Quantum

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FIS Quantum; a claim can dispute any of them.

FIS Quantum (Treasury & Risk Manager) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS Quantum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS Quantum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fisglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.