Every category where a model named Coupa Treasury for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	105 of 124	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	59 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coupa Treasury yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coupa Treasury across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Solid mid-market alternatives worth shortlisting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the best choice is usually not a full enterprise treasury platform like Kyriba or Coupa” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · soft negative

“integration into broader spend management platform may dilute treasury-specific focus” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative

“suits procurement-heavy orgs but narrower full-suite scope” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coupa Treasury, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coupa Treasury was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba21 of 2215Not in the top three

GTreasury13 of 223Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management13 of 220Not in the top three

Trovata11 of 221Not in the top three

HighRadius8 of 220Not in the top three

TIS8 of 220Not in the top three

Nomentia6 of 220Not in the top three

FIS Treasury and Risk Manager4 of 220Not in the top three

ION Treasury4 of 220Not in the top three

Oracle Treasury4 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coupa Treasury. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Coupa Treasury and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12

treasury.ripple.com10

checkthat.ai7

finantrix.com7

g2.com7

highradius.com7

debtbook.com6

kyriba.com6

worldmetrics.org6

eco.com5

Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Coupa Treasury came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems10

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems10

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools6

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems6

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/treasury-liquidity-management-solutions6

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-20265

euromoney.com/corporate-banking/competitive-intelligence/top-ranked-tms-providers5

guideflow.com/blog/treasury-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Coupa Treasury

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Coupa Treasury; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coupa 4Coupa Treasury (formerly BELLIN) 1Coupa Treasury (formerly Bellin) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coupa Treasury's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coupa Treasury, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coupa.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.