Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › FIS Treasury and Risk Manager · September 2026 Edition

FIS Treasury · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

FIS Treasury and Risk Manager

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FIS Treasury and Risk Manager was named 2 times in Cash flow forecasting and 1 other category, where Agicap led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market73 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise15 of 79

under the label threshold

In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FIS Treasury and Risk Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	73 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	47 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FIS Treasury and Risk Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FIS Treasury and Risk Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Strong cash, risk, and reporting depth for large, complex organizations.” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consider integrated TMS/TRMS tools (e.g., FIS Integrity, BroadPeak) — but expect long implementations and high costs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FIS Treasury and Risk Manager, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Treasury and Risk Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba9 of 96Not in the top three

GTreasury6 of 91Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management5 of 90Not in the top three

HighRadius4 of 91Not in the top three

Coupa Treasury4 of 90Not in the top three

Trovata4 of 90Not in the top three

Cash Flow Frog2 of 91Not in the top three

Float2 of 91Not in the top three

Agicap2 of 90Not in the top three

Nomentia2 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS Treasury and Risk Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named FIS Treasury and Risk Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org7

highradius.com5

gartner.com4

debtbook.com3

finantrix.com3

kyriba.com3

tesorio.com3

treasury.ripple.com3

chatfin.ai2

checkthat.ai2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming FIS Treasury and Risk Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems4

worldmetrics.org/best/cash-management-software4

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems3

finantrix.com/buyer-guides/treasury-liquidity-management-solutions3

kyriba.com/products/treasury3

tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared3

chatfin.ai/blog/best-ai-treasury-management-cash-forecasting-tools-20262

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FIS Treasury and Risk Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FIS Treasury and Risk Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

FIS Integrity 1FIS Treasury and Risk Manager (Integrity Edition) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS Treasury and Risk Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS Treasury and Risk Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fisglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.