Every category where a model named Flowrev for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	6%	4 of 77	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Flowrev yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Flowrev across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels7

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pocket and Flowrev are especially worth considering due to their affordability and focus on core revenue recognition needs” Mistral Small · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice

“Flowrev: Best Overall Value for Basic Automation ... Unbeatable price point for true ASC 606/IFRS 15 compliance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Value (Dedicated Software): Flowrev” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice

“If your revenue recognition needs are complex, consider Flowrev as a specialized but affordable option.” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Flowrev, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Flowrev was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Online13 of 184Not in the top three

Maxio8 of 180Not in the top three

Stripe Revenue Recognition7 of 181Not in the top three

Xero6 of 183Not in the top three

Pipedrive6 of 180Not in the top three

Chargebee5 of 181Not in the top three

TrueRev5 of 181Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite5 of 180Not in the top three

Sage Intacct4 of 180Not in the top three

Trullion3 of 181Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Flowrev. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named Flowrev and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com15

pipedrive.com14

wise.com12

zenskar.com12

truerev.com9

hubifi.com8

guideflow.com7

capterra.com6

erpresearch.com6

rightrev.com6

Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Flowrev came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software14

getapp.com/all-software/revenue-recognition/org/small-business13

wise.com/us/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software12

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software12

getapp.com/all-software/revenue-recognition8

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software7

truerev.com/blog/the-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-quickbooks7

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-20265

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Flowrev's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Flowrev, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at flowrev.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.