Every category where a model named TrueRev for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	2%	15 of 77	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TrueRev yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TrueRev across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels3

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TrueRev is the most affordable option for mid-market companies at $3,000 per year” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · first choice

“SaaS with complex contracts, need dedicated rev‑rec + finance workflows | TrueRev or Chargebee RevRec” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

“TrueRev for the best low-cost dedicated rev rec tool” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

“TrueRev: Best for B2B Sales-Assisted Contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TrueRev, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TrueRev was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Maxio13 of 171Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online9 of 172Not in the top three

Puzzle6 of 172Not in the top three

Stripe Revenue Recognition6 of 172Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite6 of 170Not in the top three

Flowrev5 of 171Not in the top three

Pipedrive5 of 171Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec5 of 170Not in the top three

Sage Intacct5 of 170Not in the top three

Zuora5 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TrueRev. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 17 answers that named TrueRev and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipedrive.com8

truerev.comYour site7

younium.com7

capterra.com6

getapp.com6

hubifi.com6

zenskar.com6

dualentry.com5

wise.com5

erpresearch.com4

Fifty-three of the sixty domain citations in answers naming TrueRev came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software8

younium.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software7

capterra.com/revenue-recognition-software6

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software5

getapp.com/all-software/revenue-recognition5

truerev.com/blog/the-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-quickbooks5

wise.com/us/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software5

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TrueRev's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TrueRev, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at truerev.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.