Every category where a model named Found for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	2%	18 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	16 of 78	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Found yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Found across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Found stands out as the best value since many core features are free, making it ideal for budget-conscious companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · Contractor payments · budget prompt · first choice

“also good if your priority is $0 monthly fees and no minimum balance” Perplexity Sonar · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative

“a fintech option like Found or Mercury is worth considering” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative

“Found if you want built-in bookkeeping and tax automation” Kimi K2 · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Found, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Found was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Mercury22 of 306Not in the top three

Relay19 of 302Not in the top three

Bluevine18 of 307Not in the top three

Chase Business Banking15 of 300Not in the top three

Novo14 of 303Not in the top three

Bank of America6 of 300Not in the top three

Brex5 of 303Not in the top three

Rho4 of 301Not in the top three

Airwallex4 of 300Not in the top three

Wells Fargo4 of 300Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Found. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 30 answers that named Found and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

found.comYour site19

nerdwallet.com15

finder.com13

forbes.com12

handelsblatt.com12

airwallex.com11

relayfi.com10

backbase.com9

wise.com9

rho.co8

Ninety-nine of the 118 domain citations in answers naming Found came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

found.com/resources/business-banking/best-business-bank-accounts-small-business13

handelsblatt.com/geschaeftskonto/vergleich12

nerdwallet.com/business/banking/best/types9

smallbusinesstools.org/guides/best-business-bank-accounts8

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/compare-business-bank-accounts7

finder.com/business-banking7

backbase.com/blog/top-business-banking-platform-providers6

forbes.com/financial-services/best-business-checking-accounts6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Found

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Found; a claim can dispute any of them.

Found Business Checking 1Found Small Business Banking 1Novo / Found 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Found's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Found, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at found.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.