Finance AI Index
Index › Vendors › Futrli · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Futrli

20Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cash flow forecasting for small business buyers
Rank 35 of 86 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 82
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market35 of 86
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise73 of 79
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Futrli for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash0%35 of 860%3under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Futrli yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Futrli across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“5. Futrli by Sage — Best for Mid-Market with ERP Integration” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Futrli, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Futrli was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Float15 of 203Not in the top three
Cash Flow Frog11 of 202Not in the top three
Fathom6 of 201Not in the top three
Agicap5 of 200Not in the top three
Pulse5 of 200Not in the top three
Kyriba4 of 203Not in the top three
Dryrun4 of 200Not in the top three
Cube3 of 202Not in the top three
QuickBooks Cash Flow Planner3 of 202Not in the top three
Clockwork3 of 201Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Futrli. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Futrli and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com12
cubesoftware.com10
fathomhq.com9
cashflowfrog.com8
tesorio.com8
upflow.io8
worldmetrics.org7
farseer.com5
highradius.com5
abacum.ai4

Seventy-six of the seventy-six domain citations in answers naming Futrli came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software10
tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared8
upflow.io/software/best-cash-flow-forecasting8
cubesoftware.com/blog/best-cash-forecasting-software6
abacum.ai/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-for-smbs4
fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-modelling-software-tools4
fathomhq.com/blog/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software4
ledge.co/content/best-cash-flow-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Futrli

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Futrli; a claim can dispute any of them.
Futrli by Sage 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Futrli's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Futrli, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at futrli.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack