Every category where a model named Pulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	2%	16 of 86	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pulse yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained16 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are on a tight budget, start with Pulse (if you use QBO/Xero)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · first choice

“one of the most budget-friendly choices... However, it doesn't offer AI-driven predictions and requires you to manually input every expected transaction.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

“Pulse (~$29/mo, 30-day free trial): Integrates only with QBO. Great for simple calendars” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

“Great if you just need to see your cash position without other features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Easiest for beginners; lightweight, low-maintenance; less feature-rich than leaders” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pulse, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pulse was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Float36 of 4314Not in the top three

Cash Flow Frog26 of 434Not in the top three

Fathom19 of 432Not in the top three

Dryrun17 of 430Not in the top three

QuickBooks Cash Flow Planner11 of 435Not in the top three

Agicap10 of 431Not in the top three

G-CashFlow8 of 432Not in the top three

Fluidly8 of 431Not in the top three

Trezy7 of 434Not in the top three

Kyriba7 of 432Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 43 answers that named Pulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com25

g-accon.com20

cubesoftware.com19

tesorio.com18

fathomhq.com17

cashflowfrog.com14

wise.com14

drivetrain.ai13

articsledge.com12

worldmetrics.org12

164 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming Pulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software25

g-accon.com/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software20

tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared18

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-cash-forecasting-software17

fathomhq.com/blog/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software15

wise.com/gb/blog/best-cashflow-management-software14

drivetrain.ai/solutions/cash-flow-forecasting-software13

articsledge.com/post/cash-flow-forecasting-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pulse.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.