Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Galvix · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Galvix

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Galvix was named 3 times in Sales tax automation, where Avalara AvaTax led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 38

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 38

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 36

under the label threshold

In sales tax automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Galvix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales tax automation	Tax and compliance	0%	16 of 38	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Avalara AvaTax at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Galvix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Galvix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Galvix if you have a finance team that wants expert human review and hands-off filing without enterprise-level costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales tax automation · comparative prompt · first choice

“Mid-market B2B with heavy "human-in-the-loop" tax-professional support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales tax automation · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Galvix, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Galvix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Avalara AvaTax10 of 102Not in the top three

TaxJar8 of 103Not in the top three

Vertex8 of 102Not in the top three

Anrok7 of 101Not in the top three

Sovos6 of 101Not in the top three

Stripe Tax6 of 100Not in the top three

TaxCloud5 of 101Not in the top three

Zamp4 of 100Not in the top three

Kintsugi2 of 100Not in the top three

Quaderno2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Galvix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 10 answers that named Galvix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

galvix.comYour site7

learn.g2.com7

taxcloud.com6

guideflow.com5

techrepublic.com5

sales.tax4

zamp.com4

avalara.com3

capterra.com3

ceretax.com3

Forty of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Galvix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

galvix.com/article/best-sales-tax-software7

learn.g2.com/best-sales-tax-compliance-software7

techrepublic.com/article/best-sales-tax-software5

guideflow.com/blog/sales-tax-automation-software4

guideflow.com/blog/sales-tax-software4

taxcloud.com/blog/sales-tax-compliance-software4

guideflow.com/blog/tax-compliance-software3

zamp.com/blog/best-sales-tax-software-and-how-to-choose3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Galvix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Galvix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at galvix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.