Every category where a model named Helcim for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	17%	1 of 91	0%	20	accepted challenger
Accounting software	Accounting and close	0%	21 of 56	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Helcim yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Helcim across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	3	4
Mistral Small	1	3	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels9

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative11 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained25 labels15

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative5 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose processors (like Helcim or specialized high-risk merchant providers) that perform manual underwriting *before* you process payments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · first choice

“For most B2B businesses with a limited budget, Helcim is the best all‑around choice due to zero monthly fees” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · first choice

“Helcim is frequently recommended as the best overall B2B payment acceptance platform for small businesses” Mistral Small · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · first choice

“Helcim \u2013 Best Overall Value ... if you process significant volume and want the lowest overall costs” Kimi K2 · B2B payment acceptance · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Helcim, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Helcim was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe50 of 626Not in the top three

Melio37 of 6210Not in the top three

BILL25 of 622Not in the top three

Plooto18 of 621Not in the top three

Stax15 of 622Not in the top three

PayPal13 of 621Not in the top three

Square13 of 621Not in the top three

QuickBooks Payments12 of 620Not in the top three

Adyen11 of 621Not in the top three

Authorize.net10 of 620Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Helcim. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 62 answers that named Helcim and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com47

techrepublic.com44

fitsmallbusiness.com38

factura.ai33

connectpay.com22

alltopbusiness.com20

helcim.comYour site19

nerdwallet.com19

highradius.com16

walletinvestor.com16

255 of the 274 domain citations in answers naming Helcim came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-payments-software47

techrepublic.com/article/best-b2b-payment-processors43

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-b2b-payment-solutions38

factura.ai/b2b-payment-platforms-small-businesses33

connectpay.com/blog/b2b-payment-platforms22

alltopbusiness.com/best-b2b-payment-software20

walletinvestor.com/news/finance-news/best-b2b-payment-platforms-in-202616

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Helcim

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Helcim; a claim can dispute any of them.

Adyen/Helcim 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Helcim's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Helcim, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at helcim.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.