Every category where a model named QuickBooks Payments for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash application	Receivables and billing	11%	3 of 83	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	63 of 83	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	45 of 91	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	72 of 86	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for QuickBooks Payments yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated QuickBooks Payments across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels2

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels10

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### 1. QuickBooks Payments / QuickBooks Online (~$22-80/month) - Best for: Small businesses already using QuickBooks” Kimi K2 · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

“if you need a simple, integrated solution and are already using QuickBooks, QuickBooks Payments is a strong choice” Mistral Small · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with QuickBooks Payments if you need basic cash application functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

“The best cash application software for a company with a limited budget is QuickBooks Payments” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash application · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users report that the app "takes your money, takes whatever they want, then passes you what's left a day or two later"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Invoicing software · negative prompt · soft negative

“limited global reach compared with dedicated contractor platforms” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Payments, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Payments was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BILL23 of 555Not in the top three

HighRadius20 of 550Not in the top three

Gaviti18 of 553Not in the top three

Billtrust17 of 550Not in the top three

Melio16 of 553Not in the top three

Stripe16 of 551Not in the top three

Helcim12 of 559Not in the top three

Wave12 of 552Not in the top three

Esker10 of 550Not in the top three

Lunos8 of 553Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuickBooks Payments. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 53 of the 55 answers that named QuickBooks Payments and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cashflowpick.com33

ledge.co24

highradius.com21

lunos.ai21

cashbook.com17

hustleandpassive.com16

fitsmallbusiness.com15

gaviti.com15

upflow.io15

factura.ai14

191 of the 191 domain citations in answers naming QuickBooks Payments came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cashflowpick.com/cash-application-software31

ledge.co/content/cash-application-software24

lunos.ai/blog/best-cash-application-software21

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide17

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools16

hustleandpassive.com/top-10-cash-management-tools16

factura.ai/b2b-payment-platforms-small-businesses14

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-cash-application-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as QuickBooks Payments

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuickBooks Payments; a claim can dispute any of them.

QuickBooks Payments / QuickBooks Online 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Payments's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Payments, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quickbooks.ninja is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.