Every category where a model named Manatal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	39 of 127	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Manatal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Manatal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative15 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Manatal, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Manatal was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gem15 of 174Not in the top three

Juicebox13 of 171Not in the top three

Loxo12 of 172Not in the top three

SeekOut10 of 170Not in the top three

HireEZ8 of 171Not in the top three

LinkedIn Recruiter8 of 170Not in the top three

Fetcher7 of 170Not in the top three

ContactOut6 of 170Not in the top three

Humanly6 of 170Not in the top three

Pin4 of 171Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Manatal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Manatal and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com14

leonar.app13

hiretruffle.com8

firsthr.app7

juicebox.ai7

dishertalent.com6

metaview.ai6

pin.com6

sitepoint.com6

sourcingtools.org6

Seventy-nine of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming Manatal came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-candidate-sourcing-tools14

leonar.app/blog/best-talent-sourcing-platforms13

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/sourcing-tools7

dishertalent.com/blog/sourcing-tools-review6

hiretruffle.com/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters6

sitepoint.com/best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters6

metaview.ai/resources/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters5

sourcrlab.com/best/best-sourcing-tools-for-startups5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Manatal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Manatal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manatal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.