Every category where a model named Loxo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	24 of 127	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Loxo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Loxo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“plus Fetcher, Juicebox, and Loxo (free tiers) are easier to evaluate on merit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · alternative

“free tiers (e.g., Juicebox, Loxo) often suffice for small teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for small teams/all-in-one CRM.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Loxo, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loxo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Juicebox13 of 151Not in the top three

Gem12 of 153Not in the top three

Manatal12 of 151Not in the top three

LinkedIn Recruiter9 of 150Not in the top three

HireEZ8 of 151Not in the top three

SeekOut8 of 150Not in the top three

Fetcher7 of 150Not in the top three

ContactOut6 of 150Not in the top three

Findem4 of 150Not in the top three

Humanly4 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loxo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Loxo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com13

leonar.app12

firsthr.app9

hiretruffle.com7

dishertalent.com6

juicebox.ai6

sitepoint.com6

sourcingtools.org6

metaview.ai5

sourcrlab.com5

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Loxo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-candidate-sourcing-tools13

leonar.app/blog/best-talent-sourcing-platforms12

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/sourcing-tools9

dishertalent.com/blog/sourcing-tools-review6

sitepoint.com/best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters6

hiretruffle.com/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters5

metaview.ai/resources/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters4

sourcrlab.com/best/best-sourcing-tools-for-startups4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loxo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loxo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at loxo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.