Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Intuit ProSeries · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Intuit ProSeries

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intuit ProSeries was named 3 times in Fixed asset accounting and 1 other category, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intuit ProSeries for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	37 of 94	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	46 of 98	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intuit ProSeries yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intuit ProSeries across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“stick to Drake Tax or ProSeries” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for tax preparation agencies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intuit ProSeries, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intuit ProSeries was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Asset Panda2 of 31Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets2 of 30Not in the top three

Sage Fixed Assets2 of 30Not in the top three

Longview Tax1 of 31Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Provision1 of 30Not in the top three

CSC Corptax1 of 30Not in the top three

Drake Tax1 of 30Not in the top three

EZOfficeInventory1 of 30Not in the top three

Hardcat1 of 30Not in the top three

IBM Maximo1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intuit ProSeries. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Intuit ProSeries and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

assetpanda.com2

getapp.com2

numeric.io2

wifitalents.com2

worldmetrics.org2

bassets.net1

bizbot.com1

capterra.com1

claimyr.com1

coastapp.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Intuit ProSeries came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

assetpanda.com/resource-center/compare/best-asset-management-software2

numeric.io/blog/fixed-asset-management-software2

bassets.net/blog/top-7-fixed-asset-accounting-software-compared1

bizbot.com/blog/10-best-fixed-asset-management-software-20241

capterra.com/p/79426/CORPTAX-MART1

claimyr.com/government-services/irs/OneSource-Tax-Provision-Software-Experiences-Costs-Alt1

coastapp.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software1

dokka.com/onestream-pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Intuit ProSeries

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intuit ProSeries; a claim can dispute any of them.

Intuit ProSeries Fixed Assets Manager 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intuit ProSeries's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intuit ProSeries, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intuit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.