Every category where a model named IBM Maximo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	28 of 94	27%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM Maximo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM Maximo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative22 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“its fixed asset module is robust for industries involving heavy machinery, oil/gas, or utilities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“For enterprise needs: IBM Maximo provides the most comprehensive asset lifecycle management” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“the heavyweight option for large organizations with thousands of assets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Large enterprises with complex needs” Kimi K2 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High complexity and long implementation cycles; better for large, multi‑asset environments” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

“The Catch: Highly expensive and requires dedicated IT support to deploy and manage.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Complex/expensive setup; overkill for SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM Maximo, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM Maximo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Fixed Assets26 of 3111Not in the top three

Asset Panda22 of 311Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets15 of 319Not in the top three

UpKeep15 of 310Not in the top three

NetSuite Fixed Assets Management14 of 311Not in the top three

Infor EAM13 of 310Not in the top three

EZOfficeInventory9 of 311Not in the top three

SAP Asset Accounting9 of 310Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS9 of 310Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets8 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM Maximo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 31 answers that named IBM Maximo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org22

guideflow.com14

assetcues.com12

gitnux.org12

financesonline.com11

assetpanda.com10

gartner.com10

softwareadvice.com10

wifitalents.com10

bizbot.com8

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming IBM Maximo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-assets-management-software19

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-management-software17

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software14

financesonline.com/fixed-asset-management11

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software10

gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-asset-management-software10

bizbot.com/blog/10-best-fixed-asset-management-software-20248

numeric.io/blog/fixed-asset-management-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM Maximo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM Maximo; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Maximo Application Suite 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Maximo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Maximo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.