Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions · September 2026 Edition
J.P. Morgan · 1 category · Ranked

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

22Judge labels
4First choices
3Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Cap table management for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 41 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cap table management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cap table managementEquity and corporate0%20 of 410%2under 10 labels · led by Carta at 44%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase8 labels3
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Carta21 of 225Not in the top three
Shareworks17 of 224Not in the top three
Pulley13 of 222Not in the top three
Ledgy13 of 220Not in the top three
Eqvista9 of 220Not in the top three
Cake Equity6 of 222Not in the top three
Qapita6 of 221Not in the top three
Astrella5 of 221Not in the top three
Certent Equity Management4 of 220Not in the top three
Mantle3 of 221Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 22 answers that named J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cakeequity.com13
guideflow.com13
learn.g2.com12
eqvista.com9
g2.com9
qapita.com9
worldmetrics.org8
carta.com7
ctacquisitions.com7
valueaddvc.com7

Ninety-four of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.
J.P. Morgan 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jpmorgan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack