Every category where a model named Kissflow Procurement for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	51 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	55 of 127	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	72 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kissflow Procurement yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kissflow Procurement across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Very user-friendly, low-code approach, good for smaller procurement teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Good if you need flexibility but slightly higher starting cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kissflow Procurement, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kissflow Procurement was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Precoro18 of 2210Not in the top three

Coupa16 of 220Not in the top three

Procurify14 of 222Not in the top three

SAP Ariba12 of 220Not in the top three

Tradogram10 of 222Not in the top three

Gatekeeper7 of 220Not in the top three

Ramp6 of 223Not in the top three

Zapro AI4 of 221Not in the top three

GEP SMART3 of 220Not in the top three

Ivalua3 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kissflow Procurement. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 22 answers that named Kissflow Procurement and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com9

mindsprint.com9

tradogram.com9

zapro.ai9

ramp.com7

softwareconnect.com6

g2.com5

softwareadvice.com5

prestigesd.com4

procuredesk.com4

Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Kissflow Procurement came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tradogram.com/blog/12-best-purchasing-software-for-small-mid-size-companies9

zapro.ai/vendor-management/best-vendor-management-software-for-smes9

ramp.com/blog/procurement-software-small-business7

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/vendor-management-software6

learn.g2.com/best-supplier-relationship-management-software4

prestigesd.com/the-top-15-best-vendor-supplier-management4

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-supplier-relationship-management-software4

suppliergateway.com/best-supplier-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Kissflow Procurement

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kissflow Procurement; a claim can dispute any of them.

Kissflow 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kissflow Procurement's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kissflow Procurement, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kissflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.