6 categories · RankedLimelight
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 4% | 9 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 21 of 95 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 45 of 52 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 74 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 82 of 96 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 77 of 133 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It's considered the best overall for mid-market financial modeling needs.” Mistral Small · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Limelight — *Best overall for mid-market modeling*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial modeling · direct prompt · first choice
“Starts at ~$1,400/month for 5 users - Good for companies needing forecasting & budgeting” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
“Limelight (Overall mid-market pick in some guides) ... Drawbacks: Newer player” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial modeling · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier ones like ... or Limelight ($1.4K/month) unless scaling soon.” Grok 4.1 Fast · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 56 answers that named Limelight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
215 of the 215 domain citations in answers naming Limelight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Limelight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Limelight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at limelighthq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.