Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Joiin · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Joiin

51Judge labels
22First choices
2Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
25% in Financial consolidation for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Joiin for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Financial consolidationAccounting and close19%2 of 960%15accepted challenger
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%15 of 680%2under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%41 of 1330%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Joiin yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Joiin across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash12104
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast10102
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.510102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels3
Comparative9 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels16
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Joiin – Best overall for small-to-midsize firms needing a balance of ease of use, multi-currency support, and a low price point.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most limited budgets, starting with Joiin at $19/month or free options like Zoho Books would be the best starting point” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“starting with Centage ... or Joiin (if you need flexible, cost-effective multi-entity consolidation)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest practical choice is usually Joiin if you need low-cost multi-entity consolidation” Perplexity Sonar · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Joiin, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Joiin was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fathom29 of 511Not in the top three
OneStream25 of 514Not in the top three
Oracle NetSuite18 of 512Not in the top three
LiveFlow18 of 511Not in the top three
Cube13 of 512Not in the top three
Centage Planning Maestro13 of 511Not in the top three
Planful12 of 511Not in the top three
Datarails10 of 512Not in the top three
Syft Analytics9 of 510Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Joiin. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 51 answers that named Joiin and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Joiin

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Joiin; a claim can dispute any of them.
Joiin / Syft Analytics 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Joiin's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Joiin, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at joiin.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.