Every category where a model named MineralTree for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	2%	8 of 60	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	2%	11 of 69	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	31 of 91	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MineralTree yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MineralTree across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	0	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	3	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AvidXchange and MineralTree are strong options for mid-market AP and payment automation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice

“MineralTree is recognized as best for mid-market payment automation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business bill pay · direct prompt · first choice

“For Traditional Mid-Market ERP Native Processing: MineralTree or AvidXchange.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business bill pay · scale prompt · alternative

“MineralTree — Best for ERP Integration Flexibility” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Technical limitations and clunky UX ... Better for simpler AP environments; struggles with complexity and edge cases.” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MineralTree, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MineralTree was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BILL19 of 223Not in the top three

Tipalti14 of 222Not in the top three

Ramp13 of 222Not in the top three

Stampli12 of 222Not in the top three

AvidXchange10 of 223Not in the top three

Melio7 of 220Not in the top three

Versapay5 of 221Not in the top three

Airbase5 of 220Not in the top three

Coupa4 of 220Not in the top three

HighRadius3 of 221Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MineralTree. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 22 answers that named MineralTree and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com8

bill.com7

ramp.com7

rillion.com7

medius.com6

conseroglobal.com5

learn.g2.com4

makershub.com4

stampli.com4

theretailexec.com4

Fifty-six of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming MineralTree came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms6

conseroglobal.com/resources/best-accounts-payable-software5

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms5

bill.com/blog/best-accounts-payable-software4

medius.com/blog/top-ap-automation-software-compared-features-fit-and-tradeoffs4

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-automation4

theretailexec.com/tools/best-b2b-payment-solutions4

wizcommerce.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MineralTree's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MineralTree, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mineraltree.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.