Every category where a model named AvidXchange for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	12%	5 of 60	16%	38	accepted challenger
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	2%	7 of 69	0%	25	accepted challenger
Cash application	Receivables and billing	2%	16 of 83	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	28 of 91	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	26 of 86	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wave at 19%
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	102 of 108	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	41 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	31 of 85	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AvidXchange yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AvidXchange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	3	2	0	6
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	1	1	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	5	1	0	6
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	5	2	2	9
Mistral Small	3	3	1	0	7
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	8	3	1	12
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	4	1	1	6
Kimi K2	1	3	2	2	8
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	4	1	2	9
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	1	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct31 labels4

Paraphrase21 labels3

Comparative40 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained14 labelsNone

Negative27 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative135 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AvidXchange | Mid‑sized businesses wanting a complete, cloud‑based AP solution ... General mid‑market AP automation (no global payments) | AvidXchange, BILL, Stampli” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounts payable automat · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“AvidXchange | Mid‑market B2B (100–1,000 employees) | Deep focus on mid‑market AP; strong ERP integrations; B2B payment network” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies, BILL or AvidXchange seem to be the most widely recommended” MiniMax M2.5 · Business bill pay · direct prompt · first choice

“AvidXchange is best for mid-market businesses that process a high volume of invoices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“AP) automation tools you should approach with caution, along with the primary reasons why users often recommend avoiding them. ### 1. AvidXchange” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative

“Significant vendor-side and operational concerns ... BBB rating 1.14/5 stars (37 reviews) — extremely poor” Kimi K2 · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative

“Common issues include delayed/missed vendor payments... BBB average is low (1.14/5 from 37 reviews)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Steer clear if you value vendor relationships or need international capabilities.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts payable automat · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AvidXchange, over the 135 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AvidXchange was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BILL110 of 13524Not in the top three

Tipalti107 of 13515Not in the top three

Stampli70 of 1355Not in the top three

Ramp68 of 1357Not in the top three

Coupa46 of 1359Not in the top three

Melio38 of 1358Not in the top three

HighRadius36 of 1356Not in the top three

Medius33 of 1356Not in the top three

Basware22 of 1351Not in the top three

Airbase17 of 1350Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AvidXchange. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 118 of the 135 answers that named AvidXchange and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

highradius.com54

ramp.com53

medius.com44

bill.com43

worldmetrics.org42

stampli.com32

corpay.com31

layer3labs.io31

learn.g2.com30

zoneandco.com29

389 of the 389 domain citations in answers naming AvidXchange came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-accounts-payable-automation-software31

medius.com/blog/top-ap-automation-software-compared-features-fit-and-tradeoffs30

zoneandco.com/articles/top-ap-automation-software-solutions29

conseroglobal.com/resources/best-accounts-payable-software27

learn.g2.com/best-accounts-payable-automation-software24

bill.com/blog/best-invoice-automation-software21

corpay.com/resources/blog/best-ap-automation-software19

gartner.com/reviews/market/b2b-payments-software18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as AvidXchange

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AvidXchange; a claim can dispute any of them.

AvidXChange 1AvidXchange (AvidPay) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AvidXchange's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AvidXchange, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at avidxchange.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.