Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Multiplier · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Multiplier

13Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Multiplier was named 7 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market21 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 76

under the label threshold

In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Multiplier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	21 of 83	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Multiplier yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Multiplier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Remote and Multiplier offer the strongest compliance automation” MiniMax M2.5 · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Risk-averse teams needing CoR coverage. | Newer features; higher cost.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Contractor of Record (CoR) service + misclassification protection.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Multiplier ($40–559) — strong classification + CoR coverage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contractor payments · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Multiplier, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Multiplier was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Remote13 of 132Not in the top three

Deel12 of 135Not in the top three

Rippling12 of 130Not in the top three

Papaya Global11 of 131Not in the top three

Tipalti11 of 130Not in the top three

Worksuite7 of 131Not in the top three

Payoneer7 of 130Not in the top three

Wise Business7 of 130Not in the top three

Gusto5 of 130Not in the top three

Fiverr Enterprise3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Multiplier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Multiplier and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

remote.com13

contractor-of-record.com10

worksuite.com10

guideflow.com8

learn.g2.com7

papayaglobal.com7

wingspan.app5

costbench.com4

deel.com4

mellow.io4

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Multiplier came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools13

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts10

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software9

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software7

guideflow.com/blog/contractor-payment-software6

papayaglobal.com/blog/10-best-contractor-payment-software5

wingspan.app/articles/best-contractor-payroll-services5

costbench.com/best/best-contractor-payment-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Multiplier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Multiplier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at multiplierhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.