Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Oracle Hyperion Financial Management · September 2026 Edition

Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Hyperion Financial Management

7Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Hyperion Financial Management was named 3 times in Financial consolidation, where Prophix led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market92 of 96

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 71

under the label threshold

In financial consolidation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Hyperion Financial Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	92 of 96	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Hyperion Financial Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Hyperion Financial Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise-grade consolidation - Score: 9.1/10” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“without the enterprise bloat of systems like SAP BPC or Oracle HFM” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Enterprise-grade, but complex.” Mistral Small · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Hyperion Financial Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream6 of 72Not in the top three

Vena5 of 70Not in the top three

Datarails4 of 70Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM4 of 70Not in the top three

Anaplan3 of 70Not in the top three

Planful3 of 70Not in the top three

SAP Business Planning and Consolidation3 of 70Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning3 of 70Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik2 of 71Not in the top three

BlackLine2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 7 answers that named Oracle Hyperion Financial Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cfoshortlist.com4

worldmetrics.org4

drivetrain.ai3

golimelight.com3

onestream.com3

b-eye.com2

cubesoftware.com2

gbhackers.com2

highradius.com2

maxima.ai2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Oracle Hyperion Financial Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/enterprise-performance-management-software3

golimelight.com/blog/best-epm-software3

b-eye.com/blog/epm-platform-implementation-issues2

gbhackers.com/best-epm-tools-compared-22

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors2

maxima.ai/articles/financial-consolidation-software2

onestream.com/blog/best-epm-software2

oracle.com/a/ocom/docs/applications/epm/oracle-cloud-epm-trustreport.pdf2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Oracle Hyperion Financial Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Hyperion Financial Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle HFM 1Oracle Hyperion Financial Management (HFM) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Hyperion Financial Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.