Every category where a model named CCH Tagetik for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	21 of 96	29%	14	criticized challenger
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	22 of 98	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	25 of 95	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	36 of 68	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	28 of 52	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	27 of 60	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	67 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CCH Tagetik yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CCH Tagetik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	3	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	2	2	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	4	0	5
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	2	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct28 labelsNone

Paraphrase13 labelsNone

Comparative51 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels1

Scale-constrained18 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative138 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. CCH Tagetik (Best Overall)” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

“best overall per many reviews” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you have complex multi-entity consolidation: CCH Tagetik or Longview provide stronger group-level consolidation” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative

“Better when you need deep compliance, disclosure, and statutory consolidation.” Perplexity Sonar · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid enterprise-grade corporate performance management (CPM) suites (like OneStream, Oracle Cloud EPM, or CCH Tagetik)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid these if you have a limited budget.” Kimi K2 · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

“tools like BlackLine, Trintech, OneStream, and CCH Tagetik can require meaningful configuration and admin effort, so they are risky” Perplexity Sonar · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · soft negative

“skew more enterprise and are generally heavier than most mid-market B2B teams need” Perplexity Sonar · Financial consolidation · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CCH Tagetik, over the 138 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CCH Tagetik was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream110 of 13841Not in the top three

Anaplan47 of 13810Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM47 of 1388Not in the top three

Planful45 of 1380Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning41 of 1380Not in the top three

Vena37 of 1380Not in the top three

BlackLine36 of 13814Not in the top three

Board36 of 1381Not in the top three

Prophix34 of 1382Not in the top three

Workiva26 of 1384Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CCH Tagetik. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 125 of the 138 answers that named CCH Tagetik and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com64

worldmetrics.org60

onestream.com49

cfoshortlist.com45

highradius.com42

prophix.com41

wolterskluwer.comYour site38

gitnux.org35

maxima.ai31

softwareconnect.com28

395 of the 433 domain citations in answers naming CCH Tagetik came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/financial-close-and-consolidation-solutions33

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams32

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-financial-consolidation-vendors29

maxima.ai/articles/financial-consolidation-software26

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-202425

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation21

onestream.com/blog/best-financial-consolidation-software21

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-financial-consolidation-software19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CCH Tagetik

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CCH Tagetik; a claim can dispute any of them.

CCH Tagetik (Wolters Kluwer) 4Tagetik 2CCH Tagetik Software 1Wolters Kluwer 1Wolters Kluwer (CCH Tagetik) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CCH Tagetik's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CCH Tagetik, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wolterskluwer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.