Every category where a model named SAP BPC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	94 of 96	80%	5	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	51 of 52	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	113 of 133	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	103 of 114	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP BPC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP BPC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	4	5
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Companies running SAP S/4HANA.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid "legacy enterprise" systems that require coding (like older versions of Hyperion or SAP BPC)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · hard negative

“significantly cheaper than enterprise solutions like Anaplan, OneStream, or SAP BPC” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · hard negative

“heavy Oracle/Hyperion or SAP BPC deployments) may drown you in complexity and cost” Kimi K2 · Financial reporting · scale prompt · hard negative

“you likely don't have the massive budget or IT staff required for Tier-1 enterprise suites like Oracle Hyperion or SAP BPC” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial consolidation · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP BPC, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP BPC was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneStream15 of 268Not in the top three

Oracle Hyperion13 of 260Not in the top three

Vena11 of 261Not in the top three

Anaplan10 of 261Not in the top three

Planful8 of 261Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning8 of 261Not in the top three

BlackLine7 of 261Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik7 of 261Not in the top three

Datarails7 of 260Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM7 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP BPC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 26 answers that named SAP BPC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cubesoftware.com8

cfoshortlist.com7

prophix.com7

gartner.com6

onestream.com6

worldmetrics.org6

learn.g2.com5

linkedin.com5

cfobound.com4

consolidate.io4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming SAP BPC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prophix.com/blog/the-12-best-financial-consolidation-software-tools-for-fp-a-teams6

cfobound.com/tools/financial-consolidation4

consolidate.io/blog/financial-consolidation-software-comparison4

maxima.ai/articles/financial-consolidation-software4

onestream.com/blog/best-financial-consolidation-software4

board.com/guide/best-fpa-software-for-enterprises3

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-financial-consolidation-tools3

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20243

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP BPC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP BPC; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP Analytics Cloud (SAC) / BPC 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP BPC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP BPC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.