Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Orangedox · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Orangedox

9Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Orangedox was named 2 times in Virtual data rooms, where iDeals led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In virtual data rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Orangedox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Virtual data rooms	Equity and corporate	0%	22 of 48	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by iDeals at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orangedox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orangedox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase3 labels2

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Teams Already Using Google Drive/Dropbox: Orangedox” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Virtual data rooms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orangedox, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orangedox was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Datasite Diligence7 of 90Not among the top eight

Papermark6 of 92Not among the top eight

DocSend5 of 91Not among the top eight

Intralinks5 of 90Not among the top eight

Peony Data Room4 of 91Not among the top eight

CapLinked3 of 90Not among the top eight

Clinked3 of 90Not among the top eight

FirmRoom3 of 90Not among the top eight

SecureDocs3 of 90Not among the top eight

iDeals3 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orangedox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Orangedox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

orangedox.comYour site9

peony.ink6

clinked.com5

reddit.com5

dealroom.net4

ellty.com4

papermark.com4

youtube.com4

dataroom-providers.org3

firmroom.com3

Thirty-eight of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Orangedox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clinked.com/virtual-data-room-providers5

orangedox.com/blog/best-m-and-a-virtual-data-rooms5

orangedox.com/blog/data-room-for-startups5

dealroom.net/resources/virtual-data-room-providers-comparison4

reddit.com/r/ExperiencedFounders/comments/1r3y87y/the_5_best_virtual_data_rooms_vdr_ive_te4

youtube.com/watch4

govern365.com/blog/virtual-data-room/best-data-room-providers3

peony.ink/blog/m-and-a-data-room3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

orangedox.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Orangedox takes 0% of first choices and iDeals takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “virtual data room”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “virtual data rooms”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 22 of 48 in virtual data rooms

Segment leader

25%

iDeals

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on orangedox.com

252

subdomains included

Content

160

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

21 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	121	36	2026-10-03	Virtual data rooms
Comparison	33	2	2026-08-31
Case study	2	0	2026-05-26
Glossary or explainer	2	0	2026-06-15
Report or ebook	1	undated
Template or tool	1	1	2026-09-04

Most recent

2026-10-03Google drive ma data room blog
2026-09-25Investor nda pitch deck blog
2026-09-18Orangedox document signing blog
2026-09-18Best biotech data rooms blog
2026-09-18Sharefile blog
2026-09-17Europe deal room slowdown 2026 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page orangedox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Orangedox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Orangedox is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Virtual data rooms for Google Drive. Protect, share and track your documents.
orangedox.com
For: startups and venture capital professionals
orangedox.com
Price stated: Virtual data room pricing from $55/month, billed yearly. orangedox.com/pricing
Starting price: 55 orangedox.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: 14-day free trial, no credit card required orangedox.com
Integrations claimed: 2 orangedox.com
Certifications: CASA Tier 2 CertifiedHIPAA CompliantGDPR CompliantCCPA CompliantGDPR ComplianceCCPA ComplianceHIPAA ComplianceCASA
Customers named: TrustNXTCivoAkemonaAtlantic MergersZiri DynamicsAlejandro SanchezB2B Tech GroupDAS
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Orangedox's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: orangedox.com, orangedox.com/pricing, orangedox.com/security, orangedox.com/features/teams. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orangedox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orangedox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orangedox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Orangedox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orangedox, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.