Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Plecto · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Plecto

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Plecto was named 4 times in Financial reporting, where Sage Intacct led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 108

under the label threshold

Mid-market43 of 133

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Plecto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	43 of 133	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Plecto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Plecto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Plecto - earns the top spot in the ranking.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Plecto (top for SMBs)” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Simple for ongoing monitoring; less depth in financials.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Plecto, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plecto was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fathom6 of 64Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI3 of 61Not in the top three

Sigma Computing3 of 61Not in the top three

Spotlight Reporting2 of 60Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online1 of 61Not in the top three

Fairview1 of 60Not in the top three

FineBI1 of 60Not in the top three

Geckoboard1 of 60Not in the top three

Klipfolio1 of 60Not in the top three

Looker Studio1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plecto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Plecto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

greatstartuptools.com6

zipdo.co6

getfairview.com5

sigmacomputing.com5

worldmetrics.org5

gitnux.org2

wifitalents.com2

427310.app.netsuite.com1

accountingseed.com1

adminlte.io1

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Plecto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

greatstartuptools.com/best-financial-dashboard-software6

zipdo.co/best/finance-dashboard-software6

getfairview.com/blog/best-financial-dashboard-software5

sigmacomputing.com/blog/best-financial-dashboard-software5

worldmetrics.org/best/finance-dashboard-software4

gitnux.org/best/finance-dashboard-software2

worldmetrics.org/best/financial-dashboard-software2

427310.app.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plecto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plecto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at plecto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.