Every category where a model named Geckoboard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	16 of 81	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Geckoboard yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Geckoboard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a more comprehensive solution under $100/month, Databox or Geckoboard would be suitable.” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · alternative

“ChartMogul free + Geckoboard ($39) or Databox Starter ($72) can be used” Llama 4 Maverick · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · alternative

“switch to Geckoboard if you prefer simplicity over complexity” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · alternative

“Geckoboard emphasizes simplicity and real-time TV dashboards” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“~$44–$79/mo (after free trial) ... Add-ons extra; not free long-term” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Geckoboard, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Geckoboard was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Databox28 of 342Not in the top three

ChartMogul26 of 3410Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics22 of 3412Not in the top three

Looker Studio22 of 348Not in the top three

Baremetrics17 of 342Not in the top three

Mixpanel13 of 340Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI11 of 341Not in the top three

PostHog11 of 340Not in the top three

Amplitude9 of 340Not in the top three

Klipfolio9 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Geckoboard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 34 answers that named Geckoboard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com25

databox.com23

getfairview.com18

taskade.com11

baremetrics.com10

saasrise.com9

coefficient.io8

fastero.com8

portermetrics.com8

chartmogul.com7

127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Geckoboard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools25

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance19

getfairview.com/best/kpi-dashboard-for-saas12

taskade.com/blog/saas-metrics-dashboard-templates11

saasrise.com/blog/saas-metrics-platform-rankings-report9

portermetrics.com/en/compare/saas-reporting-tools8

zite.com/blog/best-dashboard-software-for-small-business7

chartmogul.com/pricing6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Geckoboard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Geckoboard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at geckoboard.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.