Every category where a model named Klipfolio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	33 of 81	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	55 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Klipfolio yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Klipfolio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### 3. The Best for Multi-Source Data: Klipfolio” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Klipfolio, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Klipfolio was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Databox18 of 272Not in the top three

Looker Studio15 of 276Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI15 of 270Not in the top three

ChartMogul12 of 275Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics11 of 273Not in the top three

Tableau11 of 270Not in the top three

Baremetrics10 of 271Not in the top three

Geckoboard9 of 271Not in the top three

Amplitude8 of 270Not in the top three

Looker7 of 270Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Klipfolio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Klipfolio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

databox.com13

designrevision.com11

klipfolio.comYour site10

ustechautomations.com9

improvado.io8

getfairview.com7

worldmetrics.org7

zipdo.co7

baremetrics.com6

coefficient.io6

Seventy-four of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Klipfolio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools11

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/best-reporting-analytics-software-small-business-20268

klipfolio.com/dashboards/saas7

improvado.io/blog/marketing-reporting-software6

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance5

mrc-productivity.com/blog/2013/10/the-dangers-of-choosing-the-wrong-reporting-software5

artisangrowthstrategies.com/blog/profitwell-vs-chartmogul-vs-baremetrics-20264

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-profitwell4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Klipfolio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Klipfolio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at klipfolio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.